In the current
crisis we are facing in our nation, there are some principles that I
believe will help us negotiate successfully; as we have negotiated
through other major crises. I set them forth here:
1. Good and evil
exist. There are ways of being in this world that progress us toward
all that is good for humanity, and ways that regress us into
unnecessary suffering.
2. The line that
separates good from evil goes through the heart of every human. The
primary responsibility of every human is to deal first and foremost
with his/her own propensity for evil. No laws or systems of
government can compensate for our failure to do this. Jesus pointed
out that it is easy for us to see the evil “out there”, and
difficult to see the evil that is “in here.” And He indicated
that we would not be able to help our brother overcome his evil if we
did not first expose and exculpate our own. [Matthew 7:3-5].
3. We all share the
responsibility to stand together in confronting and overcoming
societal evil, which may be thought of as evil that takes on a
collective dynamic and is reinforced by the fact that many stand in
agreement with it, benefit from it, and find ways to rationalize
it---a sort of collective blindness. [Think of the Pharisees in
Jesus’ time, the KKK, Nazi Germany and “systemic racism” in
recent history.]
4. There is no
person nor people group that is purely evil juxtaposed against a
person or people group that is purely good. There is good in the
worst of us and evil in the best of us, to varying degrees.
5. These principles
take on a higher level of power and importance in the COLLECTIVE [vs.
individual] battles against evil specifically because they are
reinforced by the dynamic of what some have called “group
think”--attitudes and beliefs that congeal and are reinforced by
the number of people who adhere to them or benefit from them. In this
dynamic those who are predominantly good but passive can be swept up
in the demagoguery of those who are predominantly evil but loud and
passionate. Historically, much unnecessary suffering has resulted
from this human tendency.
6. Communism is an
example of a political system that has capitalized [no pun intended]
on this dynamic by fundamentally defining history as a struggle of
the oppressed against the oppressor. This mindset is not exclusive to
communism. When the human endeavor is fundamentally defined in this
paradigm, the human tendency to overlook the evil in the self and
demonize the evil in the other is maximized. Tens of millions of
people have been murdered when this mindset has taken root in
civilizations. This is a historical fact.
7.
Judaeo-Christianity and the American Constitution and Democratic
Republic that are rooted in its principles [partially stated above],
properly lived out, have the potential of providing the enduring
revolution that evolves the human family toward justice, equality,
and peace at the pace at which these can realistically be attained.
An accurate account of history reveals that this enduring revolution
has indeed been happening. [The end of slavery; women’s rights and
the elevation of womanhood; the success of the Civil Rights Movement,
and now the progressive transcendence of “systemic racism”.]
Patience and diligence are equally important in this process. Without
diligence we stagnate in oppression. And without patience we fail to
see our progress and face the tendency of over-reacting and
destroying the foundations that provide us the platform for continued
progress. This points toward the value of both the Conservative and
the Liberal endeavors. The Liberal endeavor militates against
stagnation and keeps us moving forward. The Conservative endeavor
keeps us from “throwing out the baby with the bath water” so to
speak. It works to “conserve” only that which has served all
members of the human family well. Both endeavors are equally
important and beneficial when lived out inside the parameters of the
extremes on either side. But the benefits of both can only be
contributed to the society in a context of civility in which neither
side demonizes and rejects the other in a wholesale manner.
Mark Graham
[I hope you will
share this]